Casos Clínicos
Administración intratecal de ziconotida para la resolución de la migraña crónica resistente. Caso clínico
Intrathecal administration of ziconotide as a resolution of resistant chronic migraine. A case report
2025;5:13-18. DOI: 10.20986/mpj.2025.1082/2024
Manuel Alejandro Sánchez-García1, Manuel Cortiñas-Sáenz1, Nicolás Cordero Tous1, Rafael Gálvez Mateos1
1Hospital Virgen de las Nieves (Granada)
Recepción: 19 noviembre 2024
Aceptación: 10 febrero 2025
Publicación: 21 febrero 2025
Resumen
Introducción: La migraña crónica (MC) se caracteriza por la recurrencia de episodios de cefalea intensa acompañados de un conjunto de síntomas que pueden afectar significativamente la calidad de vida de los pacientes.
Presentación del caso: Este es el caso de un varón de 46 años con antecedentes de migraña resistente y síndrome de dolor regional complejo de tipo II y dolor simpático independiente en la parte inferior de la pierna derecha, que comenzó tras una intervención quirúrgica en el cúbito. El paciente presentaba ansiedad y síntomas depresivos crecientes tras el fracaso de múltiples intervenciones terapéuticas para la CM y el dolor de la pierna, por lo que se le recomendó ziconotida intratecal para tratar el síndrome de dolor regional complejo refractario. El paciente informó de una resolución completa de su migraña con ziconotida 2,0 µg/día y 3,5 µg/día para el dolor en la parte inferior derecha de la pierna. Tras 18 meses de tratamiento con ziconotida mediante una bomba intratecal, el estado clínico del paciente siguió mejorando con una reducción notable de la frecuencia e intensidad de la migraña. La puntuación media del dolor global se redujo a 1-2 sobre 10.
Conclusión: Los autores presentan un caso en el que la administración de ziconotida intratecal tuvo éxito en el tratamiento de la migraña crónica resistente (MCR), lo cual contribuye a la creciente evidencia de que la ziconotida puede ser una opción terapéutica valiosa para el tratamiento de la MCR grave.
Palabras clave: Caso clínico, intratecal, migraña crónica, migraña crónica resistente, ziconotida.
Abstract
Introduction: Chronic migraine (CM) is characterized by the recurrence of severe headache episodes accompanied by a cluster of symptoms that can have a significant impact on the quality of life of the patients.
Case presentation: This is a case of a 46-year-old male with a history of resistant migraine and complex regional pain syndrome type II and sympathetically independent pain in the right lower leg, which started after fibula surgery. The patient exhibited increasing anxiety and depressive symptoms following the failure of multiple therapeutic interventions for CM and leg pain, and intrathecal ziconotide was recommended to treat the refractory complex regional pain syndrome. The patient reported a complete resolution of his migraine with ziconotide 2.0 μg/day and 3.5 μg/day for right lower leg pain. After 18 months of treatment with ziconotide via an intrathecal pump, the patient’s clinical condition continued to improve with a notable reduction in migraine frequency and intensity. The average pain score in global was reduced to 1-2 of 10.
Conclusion: The authors present a case in which intrathecal ziconotide therapy was successful in the treatment of resistant chronic migraine (RCM), which contributes to the growing body of evidence that ziconotide may be a valuable therapeutic option for the management of severe RCM.
Keywords: Case report, chronic migraine, intrathecal, resistant chronic migraine, ziconotide.
Artículo Completo

Introduction

Migraine is one of the most prevalent and incapacitating neurological disorders. Chronic migraine (CM) is a condition that is defined by the recurrence of severe headache episodes accompanied by a cluster of symptoms that can have a significant impact on the quality of life of the patients. CM can progress to resistant migraine (RCM), which is still treatable with certain medications, and refractory migraine, which is not well controlled with any treatment.

The precise pathophysiology of CM is yet to be fully elucidated. Treatment options for CM are divided into preventive and abortive. The efficacy of pharmacological treatment may be unsatisfactory and can be poorly tolerated (1). A variety of pharmacological agents are commonly used for the prophylactic treatment of migraine. These include antidepressants, anticonvulsants, antihypertensives, gepants, and calcitonin gene-related peptide (receptor) monoclonal antibodies. There are newer drugs that have been proven to be effective and well tolerated, but they are mostly available at a significantly higher cost, which restricts access to their use (2).

Ziconotide is a 25-amino-acid polybasic peptide derived from the venom of the marine snail Conus magus. It is a non-opioid analgesic utilized for intrathecal therapy, exhibiting selective binding affinity for N-type voltage-sensitive calcium channels. Subsequently, calcium influx is disrupted, preventing the release of neurotransmitters and neuropeptides that are involved in pain transmission. Blocking calcium channels on primary nociceptive afferent nerves in the dorsal horn of the spinal cord is an effective treatment for many forms of chronic pain, including both cancer- and noncancer-related pain of neuropathic or nociceptive etiology (3). The side effects of ziconotide include psychiatric symptoms such as confusion, memory impairment, speech disorder, hallucinations, paranoid reactions, hostility, delirium, psychosis, suicidality, and manic reactions (3,4).

The authors present a case in which intrathecal ziconotide therapy was successful in the treatment of RCM, which contributes to the growing body of evidence that ziconotide may be a valuable therapeutic option for the management of severe RCM.

Case presentation

Clinical feature

A 46-year-old male with a history of resistant migraine and complex regional pain syndrome type II and sympathetically independent pain in the right lower leg, which started after fibula surgery. The skin of the affected leg was shiny and slightly edematous. The patient reported that over-the-counter analgesics, including acetaminophen, meloxicam, and ibuprofen, as well as selective norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (duloxetine 60 mg daily), pregabalin (150 mg q12 h), opioids (fentanyl 50 µg q72 h, oxycodone 10 mg q6 h), vitamin B1, multiple nerve and sympathetic blocks, lidocaine patches, and physical therapy, did not provide the desired therapeutic benefit. No efficacy of spinal cord stimulation. The patient indicated that he was experiencing severe headaches, which were localized primarily to the right frontal and temporal regions. The headaches were abrupt in onset, persisting for approximately four to 48 hours, and were often accompanied by photophobia, phonophobia, and nausea. The average pain score reported by the patient was 7/10, the Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) score was 32, and the Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) score was 62. He was often forced to seek a quiet and dark room because of the intensity of the pain. Magnetic resonance imaging and angiography confirmed no structural abnormalities. He was discharged on verapamil and levetiracetam for migraine prevention, as well as butalbital/acetaminophen/caffeine for acute treatment of migraine attacks. No efficacy of therapy with botulinum toxin A (Figure 1), using 5 unit of botulinum toxin in each puncture point. Informed consent for publication of this case report was obtained from the patient, and authorization was obtained from Ethics Committee of The Hospital Virgen de las Nieves of Granada (Spain) to publish the case.

Treatment

The patient exhibited increasing anxiety and depressive symptoms following the failure of multiple therapeutic interventions for CM and leg pain. Following a comprehensive review of the medical history, intrathecal ziconotide therapy was recommended as a treatment option for the refractory complex regional pain syndrome. The patient underwent placement of SynchroMed II (Medtronic) intrathecal pump in the left abdomen. The intrathecal catheter tip was placed at T12. The intrathecal pump was set to deliver 0.5 µg of ziconotide per day. In the subsequent visits, the intrathecal dose of ziconotide was increased from 0.5 µg/day.

Outcomes

The patient reported a complete resolution of his migraine with ziconotide 2.0 µg/day and 3.5 µg/day for right lower leg pain. After 18 months of treatment with ziconotide administered via an intrathecal pump, the patient’s clinical condition continued to improve, with a notable reduction in migraine frequency and intensity. The average pain score in global was reduced to 1-2 of 10. Additionally, the patient exhibited a significant improvement in disability levels, from severe to minimal, as evidenced by validated instruments (MIDAS, HIT-6, and IBS Patient Global Impression of Change). No side effects were experienced by the patient associated with either the ziconotide trial or the subsequent placement of the intrathecal pump.

Discussion

The release of neurotransmitters is regulated by the neuronal-type voltage-gated calcium channels (Cav2.2). Ziconotide is a peptide that acts as a selective pore blocker of the Cav2.2 channel, and it has been approved for clinical use as a treatment for patients with of intractable pain. Flunarizine, a long-acting calcium channel blocker, has been shown to be effective in the treatment of hemiplegic migraine in a pediatric study (5). Ziconotide does not cause withdrawal with abrupt discontinuation, does not cause tolerance or dependence, is not associated with catheter tip granuloma, and has not been identified as the agent responsible for any death from an accidental overdose (3,4).

The management of RCM requires optimization of acute and preventive treatment. Additionally, psychological support should be considered. In individuals with RCM, the combination of pharmacological and neuromodulation treatments may be a viable therapeutic option. A review of existing case series and retrospective studies has indicated that dual therapy with botulinum toxin A and CGRP-mAbs may be an effective treatment option for individuals who did not respond to all or the majority of available treatments (3).

The efficacious use of intrathecal ziconotide in the management of CM, chronic trigeminal neuralgia, and persistent idiopathic facial pain, has been documented in various case reports in the scientific literature (6-11) (see Table I). The administration of ziconotide is recommended as a treatment option for patients with neuropathic facial pain subsequent to the implementation of the therapy outlined in the established guidelines (8).

The patient described in this case report exhibited a near-complete resolution of RCM with pump intrathecal monotherapy at exceedingly low doses (2.0 µg/day) of ziconotide (the maximum daily dose of intrathecal ziconotide has been established as 19.2 μg/day). The administration of ziconotide at a dosage of 1-2 micrograms per day has been demonstrated to be an effective treatment for achieving complete resolution in the cases of RCM (6,7). In the case of our patient, the intrathecal catheter tip is situated at the base of the T12 vertebral body. Due to its hydrophilic nature, the ziconotide molecule may be able to diffuse through the cerebrospinal fluid, thereby blocking the transmission of nociceptive signals from higher neurons. The successful treatment of patients with CM and trigeminal neuralgia pain with ziconotide at the T9, T12-L1 and L3-L4 levels indicates that the catheter tip position does not affect the efficacy of the treatment in managing symptoms.

Two novel dosing paradigms have been described in the literature with the aim of improving the safety and efficacy of ziconotide. One of these is the overnight bolus dosing, also known as flex dosing, and the other is the patient-controlled administration (12). The proposed dosing strategies take into account preliminary data indicating a greater distribution of ziconotide in the cerebrospinal fluid when administered via bolus injection rather than with continuous infusion (13). Narain et al. employed bolus/flex doses every four hours (6), whereas Holden et al. started with a continuous dosing regimen. This indicates that the observed symptom relief may be attributable to the overall dosage of ziconotide rather than to the number of dosing intervals (7). In our unit we have used the continuous infusion of ziconotide and recommend that continuous infusion of IT ziconotide is initiated at a dose of 0.5 µg/day and increased in weekly increments of ≤0.5 µg/day depending on analgesia and tolerability.

It has been determined that the occurrence of adverse effects associated with intrathecal ziconotide is independent of the absolute dose administered but dependent on the rate of dose increases (14,15). Staub et al. described two dose increases of ziconotide (at 10 and 18 months) following intrathecal ziconotide pump placement. This may prompt the question of the potential development of tolerance to ziconotide in the patient (10). In the case of the patient described herein, six separate dose increases of ziconotide (0.5 µg/day each time) have been required, and the patient remains free of pain and side effects at the current dose (3.5 µg/day).

Holden and Staub indicated temporary complete resolution of CM and facial pain with a single-injection intrathecal trial of ziconotide.

It is not possible to draw any conclusions from this single, uncontrolled case study. However, our observations and the present case report suggest that intrathecal pump delivery of ziconotide may be a potential therapy for the management of RCM.

Conclusion

Based on our findings, intrathecal pump of ziconotide may represent a promising treatment option for RCM patients. To further investigate the effects of ziconotide in migraine patients and validate these findings, future research is required on a large-scale, with multicenter randomized trials.

Acknowledgements

The staff of the Pain Unit departments of Virgen de las Nieves Hospital (Granada-Spain) are acknowledged for their collaboration in the study. The study results were included in work submitted by Dr. Manuel Alejandro García-Sánchez as part of the requirements of the doctorate program in medicine at the University of Granada, Granada, Spain.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

The case was conducted in the normal course of patient treatment in the Pain Unit. This research received no external funding.

Author contributions

All authors contributed to concept and design, statistical analysis and drafting the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Institutional review board statement

As a single-case report with the patient’s signed consent, no other ethical review was required. However, authorization was obtained from Ethics Committee of The Hospital Virgen de las Nieves of Granada (Spain) to publish the case.

Informed consent statement

The patient gave his consent to publish this paper describing his case.

references

1. Han X, Yu S. Non-Pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023;27(11):663-72. DOI: 10.1007/s11916-023-01162-x.

2. Siddiqui M, Shah PV, Balani P, Lopez AR, Nobleza CMN, Khan S. Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Superiority of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies and Botox in Preventing and Treating Migraines. Cureus. 2021;13(1):e13002. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.c41.

3. Deer T, Hagedorn JM. How has ziconotide impacted non-cancer pain management?. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(5):507-11. DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1707182.

4. Matis G, De Negri P, Dupoiron D, Likar R, Zuidema X, Rasche D. Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?. Brain Behav. 2021;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e02055. DOI: 10.1002/brb3.2055.

5. Peer Mohamed B, Goadsby PJ, Prabhakar P. Safety and efficacy of flunarizine in childhood migraine: 11 years’ experience, with emphasis on its effect in hemiplegic migraine. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(3):274-7. DOI: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2011.04154.x.

6. Narain S, Al-Khoury L, Chang E. Resolution of chronic migraine headaches with intrathecal ziconotide: a case report. J Pain Res. 2015;8:603-6.

7. Holden R, Chauhan G, Emerick T. Intrathecal Administration of Ziconotide as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Migraines. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23714. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.23714.

8. Lux EA. Case report: successful treatment of a patient with trigeminal neuropathy using ziconotide. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(4):1195-7. DOI: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181cfc307.

9. Michiels WB, McGlthlen GL, Platt BJ, Grigsby EJ. Trigeminal neuralgia relief with intrathecal ziconotide. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(4):352-4. DOI: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181fb22f4.

10. Staub BP, Casini GP, Monaco EA 3rd, Sekula RF Jr, Emerick TD. Near-resolution of persistent idiopathic facial pain with low-dose lumbar intrathecal ziconotide: a case report. J Pain Res. 2019;12:945-9. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S193746.

11. Lux EA, Rasche D. Erfahrungen mit intrathekaler First-line-Therapie mit Ziconotide bei Patienten mit neuropathischen Gesichtsschmerzen [Experience in treatment of patients with neuropathic facial pain using ziconotide]. Schmerz. 2011;25(4):434-9. DOI: 10.1007/s00482-011-1080-x.

12. McDowell GC 2nd, Pope JE. Intrathecal Ziconotide: Dosing and Administration Strategies in Patients With Refractory Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation. 2016;19(5):522532.

13. Flack SH, Bernards CM. Cerebrospinal fluid and spinal cord distribution of hyperbaric bupivacaine and baclofen during slow intrathecal infusion in pigs. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(1):165-73. DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c38da5.

14. Deer TR, Prager J, Levy R, Burton A, Buchser E, Caraway D, et al. Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference--2012: recommendations on trialing for intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel. Neuromodulation. 2012;15(5):420-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1525-1403.2012.00450.x.

15. Pope JE, Deer TR. Ziconotide: a clinical update and pharmacologic review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14(7):957-66. DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2013.784269.

Nuevo comentario
Comentarios
No hay comentarios para este artículo.
Bibliografía
1. 1. Han X, Yu S. Non-Pharmacological Treatment for Chronic Migraine. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2023;27(11):663-72.
2. 2. Siddiqui M, Shah PV, Balani P, Lopez AR, Nobleza CMN, Khan S. Comparing the Efficacy, Safety, and Superiority of Calcitonin Gene-Related Peptide Monoclonal Antibodies and Botox in Preventing and Treating Migraines. Cureus. 2021;13(1):e13002.
3. 3. Deer T, Hagedorn JM. How has ziconotide impacted non-cancer pain management?. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2020;21(5):507-11.
4. 4. Matis G, De Negri P, Dupoiron D, Likar R, Zuidema X, Rasche D. Intrathecal pain management with ziconotide: Time for consensus?. Brain Behav. 2021;11 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):e02055.
5. 5. Peer Mohamed B, Goadsby PJ, Prabhakar P. Safety and efficacy of flunarizine in childhood migraine: 11 years' experience, with emphasis on its effect in hemiplegic migraine. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54(3):274-7.
6. 6. Narain S, Al-Khoury L, Chang E. Resolution of chronic migraine headaches with intrathecal ziconotide: a case report. J Pain Res. 2015;8:603-6.
7. 7. Holden R, Chauhan G, Emerick T. Intrathecal Administration of Ziconotide as a Potential Treatment for Chronic Migraines. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23714.
8. 8. Lux EA. Case report: successful treatment of a patient with trigeminal neuropathy using ziconotide. Anesth Analg. 2010;110(4):1195-7.
9. 9. Michiels WB, McGlthlen GL, Platt BJ, Grigsby EJ. Trigeminal neuralgia relief with intrathecal ziconotide. Clin J Pain. 2011;27(4):352-4.
10. 10. Staub BP, Casini GP, Monaco EA 3rd, Sekula RF Jr, Emerick TD. Near-resolution of persistent idiopathic facial pain with low-dose lumbar intrathecal ziconotide: a case report. J Pain Res. 2019;12:945-9.
11. 11. Lux EA, Rasche D. Erfahrungen mit intrathekaler First-line-Therapie mit Ziconotide bei Patienten mit neuropathischen Gesichtsschmerzen [Experience in treatment of patients with neuropathic facial pain using ziconotide]. Schmerz. 2011;25(4):434-9.
12. 12. McDowell GC 2nd, Pope JE. Intrathecal Ziconotide: Dosing and Administration Strategies in Patients With Refractory Chronic Pain. Neuromodulation. 2016;19(5):522532.
13. 13. Flack SH, Bernards CM. Cerebrospinal fluid and spinal cord distribution of hyperbaric bupivacaine and baclofen during slow intrathecal infusion in pigs. Anesthesiology. 2010;112(1):165-73.
14. 14. Deer TR, Prager J, Levy R, Burton A, Buchser E, Caraway D, et al. Polyanalgesic Consensus Conference--2012: recommendations on trialing for intrathecal (intraspinal) drug delivery: report of an interdisciplinary expert panel. Neuromodulation. 2012;15(5):420-35.
15. 15. Pope JE, Deer TR. Ziconotide: a clinical update and pharmacologic review. Expert Opin Pharmacother. 2013;14(7):957-66.
Multimedia
Contenido no disponible.
Instrucciones para citar
Sánchez-García M, Cortiñas-Sáenz M, Cordero Tous N, Gálvez Mateos R. Administración intratecal de ziconotida para la resolución de la migraña crónica resistente. Caso clínico. MPJ. 2025;5:13-18 DOI: 1020986/mpj20251082/2024


Descargar a un gestores de citas

Descargue la cita de este artículo haciendo clic en uno de los siguientes gestores de citas:

Métrica
Este artículo ha sido visitado 442 veces.
Este artículo ha sido descargado 19 veces.

Estadísticas de Dimensions


Estadísticas de Plum Analytics

Compartir
Valoración del lector:
Valora este artículo:
Los artículos más leídos
16 abril 2024
Revisiones
Esperanza Regueras, Ignacio Velázquez, Luis Miguel Torres
20 mayo 2021
Artículo Especial
Esperanza Regueras Escudero1, José López Guzmán1
1Universidad de Navarra. Pamplona
15 diciembre 2022
Revisiones
Francisco J Blanco, Carlos Gavín, Miguel Ángel Caracuel, Jacobo Formigo-Couceiro
5 abril 2021
Revisiones
Borja Mugabure Bujedo1, Miguel Marín Paredes1, Deiene Lasuen Aguirre2, María Luisa Franco Gay2
1Unidad del Dolor. Servicio de Anestesiología, Reanimación y Tratamiento del Dolor. Hospital Universitario de Donostia. San Sebastián, 2Unidad del Dolor. Hospital Universitario de Cruces. Barakaldo